Increases NUM_BUFFER_SLOTS from 32 to 64 and changes the mask
returned by IGBC::getReleasedBuffers from 32 to 64 bits.
Bug: 13174352
Change-Id: Ie8ef0853916cfb91f83881c7241886bb1950f01a
Adds a test that puts the BufferQueue into its own process and
connects to it over remote binder interfaces. This exposed the fact
that while IGBC was technically binderized, it didn't actually work
when flattened, so this change also fixes that.
Change-Id: I728cdb662a4273ddd3440ed6040a12560313fe68
Sideband streams are essentially a device-specific buffer queue that
bypasses the BufferQueue system. They can be used for situations with
hard real-time requirements like high-quality TV and video playback
with A/V sync. A handle to the stream is provided by the source HAL,
and attached to a BufferQueue. The sink HAL can read buffers via the
stream handle rather than acquiring individual buffers from the
BufferQueue.
Change-Id: Ib3f262eddfc520f4bbe3d9b91753ed7dd09d3a9b
Adds detachBuffer and attachBuffer calls to both the producer and
consumer sides of BufferQueue. Buffers may be detached while dequeued
by the producer or acquired by the consumer, and when attached, enter
the dequeued and acquired states, respectively.
Bug: 13173343
Change-Id: Ic152692b0a94d99e0135b9bfa62747dab2a54220
we add a flag to ANativeWindow::setBufferTransform that means
"apply the inverse rotation of the display this buffer is displayed
onto to".
Bug: 10804238
Change-Id: Id2447676271950463e8dbcef1b95935c5c3f32b2
This change adds an entire field to note whether the timestamp was
auto-generated by Surface or supplied by the application.
The value is used when deciding whether or not to drop frames based
on buffer presentation timestamps. If a desired presentation time
was set explicitly, BufferQueue will use that value to decide if a
frame should be dropped. If the timestamp was generated by Surface
at the time the buffer was queued, the timestamp is ignored.
Bug 10151804
Change-Id: Ibd571a7578351063b813cbdad2ddbeed70655ba5
this means they only have access to the consumer end of
the interface. we had a lot of code that assumed consumers
where holding a BufferQueue (i.e.: both ends), so most of
this change is untangling in fix that
Bug: 9265647
Change-Id: Ic2e2596ee14c7535f51bf26d9a897a0fc036d22c
While currently untested, this should allow to move the
BuffereQueue in the consumer process and have everything
work as usual.
Bug: 9265647
Change-Id: I9ca8f099f7c65b9a27b7e7a3643b46d1b58eacfc
Dan Stoza