The waitforvsync.cpp throws error when compiling. Following is the error log
target thumb C++: test-waitforvsync <= frameworks/native/services/surfaceflinger/tests/waitforvsync/waitforvsync.cpp
frameworks/native/services/surfaceflinger/tests/waitforvsync/waitforvsync.cpp: In function 'int main(int, char**)':
frameworks/native/services/surfaceflinger/tests/waitforvsync/waitforvsync.cpp:43:17: error: 'close' was not declared in this scope
close(fd);
^
....
....
make: *** [out/target/product/grouper/obj/EXECUTABLES/test-waitforvsync_intermediates/waitforvsync.o] Error 1
the file is missing #include <unistd.h>
Change-Id: I57728dbde65641cd3138625f9a590f9db8648158
Signed-off-by: Nanik Tolaram <nanikjava@gmail.com>
Use only display tokens in the API to refer to new displays.
Don't require the caller to specify the display when creating
a surface (since in general a surface could be shown on
any display).
This is intended to be a minimum change just to update the API.
Note that SurfaceFlinger still uses DisplayID in a few places
internally that might cause some features not to work properly
when there are multiple displays (LayerScreenshot, for example).
Change-Id: I3d91eec2da406eefd97bcd53655d403ad865a7e6
pdk builds don't have libandroid.so available. Remove it from
projects that aren't actually using it.
Change-Id: I100dc84aaf8160c1062a122ef6d5aec0534d73fa
Most of these tests in this directory don't currently build,
but test-surface did build incorrectly by bad luck, using the old API.
test-resize still doesn't build, but when the other build errors
are fixed then it will use the right API.
Change-Id: I388d6d59fe0a2328f352214dcdc28839a24043f0
vsync events were sometimes delivered to connected
client who didn't request them. this happened if
another client requested the delivery and that client
was first in the client list.
also fix the vsync test which didn't request any events as
well as DisplayEventReveiver documentation which was misleading
about the necessity to request vsync events.
Change-Id: Ie990fda3f337f8f0042745c4b2cde67936c45686
use gui/DisplayEvent to receive the events. Events are
dispatched through a unix pipe, so the API is compatible
with utils/Looper. see gui/DisplayEvent.h for more info.
Bug: 1475048
Change-Id: Ia720f64d1b950328b47b22c6a86042e481d35f09
This change adds two tests for SurfaceFlinger's behavior when updating
the position and size of a layer.
Change-Id: Id5e3ca1d7e629a3bd2c2d28275d80c7f9256d6da
this is the first step in unifying surfacetexture and surface.
for this reason the header files were not moved, as most of them
will eventually go away.
NOTE: currently we keep libsurfaceflinger_client.so as an empty
library to workaround prebuilt binaries wrongly linking against
it.
Change-Id: I130f0de2428e8579033dc41394d093f4e1431a00
o Update the copyright date on InputDispatcher_test.cpp and InputReader_test.cpp
because these two files were moved from other places to the current location,
and were actually created in 2010.
bug - 4119349
Change-Id: Ic93b81ddafb58e9e72a2e9e02ca3d9f173d6dca7
The problem wasn't in the multiply operator, but rather in the code
that built the transform from the HAL bitmask.
We now use the multiply operator to build the Transform from the bitmask,
which guarantees, it'll always be correct.
Also added a simple test for Transform.
Change-Id: I09bf3b0e51d92f59d83ea91c4cc94fc2aa0bf227
the core screenshot function now can capture the screen at any lower resolution
performing bilinear filtering.
we also now have some client code to interface with the screenshot service.
it's now possible to request a screenshot at a lower resolution.
Change-Id: I33689bba98507ab928d0898b21596d0d2fe4b953
this situation happened when the last buffer needed to be resized
(or allocated, the first time). the assumption was that the buffer
was in use by SF itself as the current buffer (obviously, this
assumption made no sense when the buffer had never been allocated, btw).
the system would wait until some other buffer became the "front" buffer.
we fix this problem by entirely removing the requirement that the
buffer being resized cannot be the front buffer. instead, we just
allocate a new buffer and replace the front buffer by the new one.
the downside is that this uses more memory (an extra buffer) for a
brief amount of time while the old buffer is being reallocated and
before it has actually been replaced.
Change-Id: I022e4621209474ceb1c671b23deb4188eaaa7285
moved surfaceflinger, audioflinger, cameraservice
all native services should now reside in this location.
Change-Id: Iee42b83dd2a94c3bf5107ab0895fe2dfcd5337a8
