585 lines
27 KiB
Java
585 lines
27 KiB
Java
/*
|
|
* Copyright (C) 2010 The Android Open Source Project
|
|
*
|
|
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
*
|
|
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
*
|
|
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
* limitations under the License.
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
package com.android.email;
|
|
|
|
import com.android.email.provider.ContentCache;
|
|
import com.android.email.provider.EmailProvider;
|
|
import com.android.email.provider.ProviderTestUtils;
|
|
import com.android.emailcommon.provider.EmailContent;
|
|
import com.android.emailcommon.provider.EmailContent.Account;
|
|
import com.android.emailcommon.provider.EmailContent.Mailbox;
|
|
import com.android.emailcommon.provider.EmailContent.Message;
|
|
import com.android.emailcommon.provider.Policy;
|
|
import com.android.emailcommon.service.LegacyPolicySet;
|
|
|
|
import android.app.admin.DevicePolicyManager;
|
|
import android.content.Context;
|
|
import android.content.ContextWrapper;
|
|
import android.test.ProviderTestCase2;
|
|
import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.MediumTest;
|
|
import android.test.suitebuilder.annotation.SmallTest;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* This is a series of unit tests for backup/restore of the SecurityPolicy class.
|
|
*
|
|
* You can run this entire test case with:
|
|
* runtest -c com.android.email.SecurityPolicyTests email
|
|
*/
|
|
|
|
@MediumTest
|
|
public class SecurityPolicyTests extends ProviderTestCase2<EmailProvider> {
|
|
|
|
private Context mMockContext;
|
|
private SecurityPolicy mSecurityPolicy;
|
|
|
|
public SecurityPolicyTests() {
|
|
super(EmailProvider.class, EmailContent.AUTHORITY);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private static final Policy EMPTY_POLICY = new Policy();
|
|
|
|
@Override
|
|
protected void setUp() throws Exception {
|
|
super.setUp();
|
|
mMockContext = new MockContext2(getMockContext(), mContext);
|
|
// Invalidate all caches, since we reset the database for each test
|
|
ContentCache.invalidateAllCachesForTest();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Delete any dummy accounts we set up for this test
|
|
*/
|
|
@Override
|
|
protected void tearDown() throws Exception {
|
|
super.tearDown();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Private context wrapper used to add back getPackageName() for these tests.
|
|
*
|
|
* This class also implements {@link Context} method(s) that are called during tests.
|
|
*/
|
|
private static class MockContext2 extends ContextWrapper {
|
|
|
|
private final Context mRealContext;
|
|
|
|
public MockContext2(Context mockContext, Context realContext) {
|
|
super(mockContext);
|
|
mRealContext = realContext;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Override
|
|
public Context getApplicationContext() {
|
|
return this;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Override
|
|
public String getPackageName() {
|
|
return mRealContext.getPackageName();
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
@Override
|
|
public Object getSystemService(String name) {
|
|
return mRealContext.getSystemService(name);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create a Policy using the arguments formerly used to create a PolicySet; this minimizes the
|
|
* changes needed for re-using the PolicySet unit test logic
|
|
*/
|
|
private Policy setupPolicy(int minPasswordLength, int passwordMode, int maxPasswordFails,
|
|
int maxScreenLockTime, boolean requireRemoteWipe, int passwordExpirationDays,
|
|
int passwordHistory, int passwordComplexChars, boolean requireEncryption,
|
|
boolean requireEncryptionExternal) throws IllegalArgumentException {
|
|
Policy policy = new Policy();
|
|
policy.mPasswordMinLength = minPasswordLength;
|
|
policy.mPasswordMode = passwordMode;
|
|
policy.mPasswordMaxFails = maxPasswordFails;
|
|
policy.mMaxScreenLockTime = maxScreenLockTime;
|
|
policy.mRequireRemoteWipe = requireRemoteWipe;
|
|
policy.mPasswordExpirationDays = passwordExpirationDays;
|
|
policy.mPasswordHistory = passwordHistory;
|
|
policy.mPasswordComplexChars = passwordComplexChars;
|
|
policy.mRequireEncryption = requireEncryption;
|
|
policy.mRequireEncryptionExternal = requireEncryptionExternal;
|
|
return policy;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test business logic of aggregating accounts with policies
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testAggregator() {
|
|
mSecurityPolicy = SecurityPolicy.getInstance(mMockContext);
|
|
|
|
// with no accounts, should return empty set
|
|
assertEquals(EMPTY_POLICY, mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy());
|
|
|
|
// with accounts having no security, empty set
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("no-sec-1", true, mMockContext);
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("no-sec-2", true, mMockContext);
|
|
assertEquals(EMPTY_POLICY, mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy());
|
|
|
|
// with a single account in security mode, should return same security as in account
|
|
// first test with partially-populated policies
|
|
Account a3 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("sec-3", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p3ain = setupPolicy(10, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, 0, 0, false, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p3ain.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a3, "0");
|
|
Policy p3aout = mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertNotNull(p3aout);
|
|
assertEquals(p3ain, p3aout);
|
|
|
|
// Repeat that test with fully-populated policies
|
|
Policy p3bin = setupPolicy(10, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, 15, 16, false, 6, 2, 3,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p3bin.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a3, "0");
|
|
Policy p3bout = mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertNotNull(p3bout);
|
|
assertEquals(p3bin, p3bout);
|
|
|
|
// add another account which mixes it up (some fields will change, others will not)
|
|
// pw length and pw mode - max logic - will change because larger #s here
|
|
// fail count and lock timer - min logic - will *not* change because larger #s here
|
|
// wipe required - OR logic - will *not* change here because false
|
|
// expiration - will not change because 0 (unspecified)
|
|
// max complex chars - max logic - will change
|
|
// encryption required - OR logic - will *not* change here because false
|
|
// encryption external req'd - OR logic - will *not* change here because false
|
|
Policy p4in = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 0, 5, 7,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
Account a4 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("sec-4", true, mMockContext);
|
|
p4in.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a4, "0");
|
|
Policy p4out = mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertNotNull(p4out);
|
|
assertEquals(20, p4out.mPasswordMinLength);
|
|
assertEquals(Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, p4out.mPasswordMode);
|
|
assertEquals(15, p4out.mPasswordMaxFails);
|
|
assertEquals(16, p4out.mMaxScreenLockTime);
|
|
assertEquals(6, p4out.mPasswordExpirationDays);
|
|
assertEquals(5, p4out.mPasswordHistory);
|
|
assertEquals(7, p4out.mPasswordComplexChars);
|
|
assertFalse(p4out.mRequireRemoteWipe);
|
|
assertFalse(p4out.mRequireEncryption);
|
|
assertFalse(p4out.mRequireEncryptionExternal);
|
|
|
|
// add another account which mixes it up (the remaining fields will change)
|
|
// pw length and pw mode - max logic - will *not* change because smaller #s here
|
|
// fail count and lock timer - min logic - will change because smaller #s here
|
|
// wipe required - OR logic - will change here because true
|
|
// expiration time - min logic - will change because lower here
|
|
// history & complex chars - will not change because 0 (unspecified)
|
|
// encryption required - OR logic - will change here because true
|
|
// encryption external req'd - OR logic - will *not* change here because false
|
|
Policy p5in = setupPolicy(4, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, 5, 6, true, 1, 0, 0,
|
|
true, false);
|
|
Account a5 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("sec-5", true, mMockContext);
|
|
p5in.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a5, "0");
|
|
Policy p5out = mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertNotNull(p5out);
|
|
assertEquals(20, p5out.mPasswordMinLength);
|
|
assertEquals(Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, p5out.mPasswordMode);
|
|
assertEquals(5, p5out.mPasswordMaxFails);
|
|
assertEquals(6, p5out.mMaxScreenLockTime);
|
|
assertEquals(1, p5out.mPasswordExpirationDays);
|
|
assertEquals(5, p5out.mPasswordHistory);
|
|
assertEquals(7, p5out.mPasswordComplexChars);
|
|
assertTrue(p5out.mRequireRemoteWipe);
|
|
assertFalse(p5out.mRequireEncryptionExternal);
|
|
|
|
// add another account that continues to mutate fields
|
|
// encryption external req'd - OR logic - will change here because true
|
|
Policy p6in = setupPolicy(0, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE, 0, 0, false, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
false, true);
|
|
Account a6 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("sec-6", true, mMockContext);
|
|
p6in.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a6, "0");
|
|
Policy p6out = mSecurityPolicy.computeAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertNotNull(p6out);
|
|
assertTrue(p6out.mRequireEncryptionExternal);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test equality. Note, the tests for inequality are poor, as each field should
|
|
* be tested individually.
|
|
*/
|
|
@SmallTest
|
|
public void testEquals() {
|
|
Policy p1 =
|
|
setupPolicy(1, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 3, 4, true, 7, 8, 9, false, false);
|
|
Policy p2 =
|
|
setupPolicy(1, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 3, 4, true, 7, 8, 9, false, false);
|
|
Policy p3 =
|
|
setupPolicy(2, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, 5, 6, true, 7, 8, 9, false, false);
|
|
assertTrue(p1.equals(p2));
|
|
assertFalse(p2.equals(p3));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test the API to set/clear policy hold flags in an account
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testSetClearHoldFlag() {
|
|
Account a1 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("holdflag-1", false, mMockContext);
|
|
a1.mFlags = Account.FLAGS_NOTIFY_NEW_MAIL;
|
|
a1.save(mMockContext);
|
|
Account a2 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("holdflag-2", false, mMockContext);
|
|
a2.mFlags = Account.FLAGS_VIBRATE_ALWAYS | Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD;
|
|
a2.save(mMockContext);
|
|
|
|
// confirm clear until set
|
|
Account a1a = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a1.mId);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_NOTIFY_NEW_MAIL, a1a.mFlags);
|
|
SecurityPolicy.setAccountHoldFlag(mMockContext, a1, true);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_NOTIFY_NEW_MAIL | Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD, a1.mFlags);
|
|
Account a1b = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a1.mId);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_NOTIFY_NEW_MAIL | Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD, a1b.mFlags);
|
|
|
|
// confirm set until cleared
|
|
Account a2a = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a2.mId);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_VIBRATE_ALWAYS | Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD, a2a.mFlags);
|
|
SecurityPolicy.setAccountHoldFlag(mMockContext, a2, false);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_VIBRATE_ALWAYS, a2.mFlags);
|
|
Account a2b = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a2.mId);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_VIBRATE_ALWAYS, a2b.mFlags);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private static class MockController extends Controller {
|
|
protected MockController(Context context) {
|
|
super(context);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
protected void backupAccounts(Context context) {
|
|
// For testing, we don't want to back up our accounts
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test the response to disabling DeviceAdmin status
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testDisableAdmin() {
|
|
Account a1 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("disable-1", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p1 = setupPolicy(10, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, 0, 0, false, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p1.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a1, "security-sync-key-1");
|
|
|
|
Account a2 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("disable-2", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p2 = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p2.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a2, "security-sync-key-2");
|
|
|
|
Account a3 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("disable-3", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy.clearAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a3);
|
|
|
|
mSecurityPolicy = SecurityPolicy.getInstance(mMockContext);
|
|
|
|
// Confirm that "enabling" device admin does not change security status (policy & sync key)
|
|
Policy before = mSecurityPolicy.getAggregatePolicy();
|
|
mSecurityPolicy.onAdminEnabled(true); // "enabled" should not change anything
|
|
Policy after1 = mSecurityPolicy.getAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertEquals(before, after1);
|
|
Account a1a = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a1.mId);
|
|
assertNotNull(a1a.mSecuritySyncKey);
|
|
assertTrue(a1a.mPolicyKey > 0);
|
|
Account a2a = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a2.mId);
|
|
assertNotNull(a2a.mSecuritySyncKey);
|
|
assertTrue(a2a.mPolicyKey > 0);
|
|
Account a3a = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a3.mId);
|
|
assertNull(a3a.mSecuritySyncKey);
|
|
assertTrue(a3a.mPolicyKey == 0);
|
|
|
|
// Simulate revoke of device admin; directly call deleteSecuredAccounts, which is normally
|
|
// called from a background thread
|
|
MockController mockController = new MockController(mMockContext);
|
|
Controller.injectMockControllerForTest(mockController);
|
|
try {
|
|
mSecurityPolicy.deleteSecuredAccounts(mMockContext);
|
|
Policy after2 = mSecurityPolicy.getAggregatePolicy();
|
|
assertEquals(EMPTY_POLICY, after2);
|
|
Account a1b = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a1.mId);
|
|
assertNull(a1b);
|
|
Account a2b = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a2.mId);
|
|
assertNull(a2b);
|
|
Account a3b = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, a3.mId);
|
|
assertNull(a3b.mSecuritySyncKey);
|
|
} finally {
|
|
Controller.injectMockControllerForTest(null);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test the scanner that finds expiring accounts
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testFindExpiringAccount() {
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expiring-1", true, mMockContext);
|
|
|
|
// With no expiring accounts, this should return null.
|
|
long nextExpiringAccountId = SecurityPolicy.findShortestExpiration(mMockContext);
|
|
assertEquals(-1, nextExpiringAccountId);
|
|
|
|
// Add a single expiring account
|
|
Account a2 =
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expiring-2", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p2 = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 30, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p2.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a2, "0");
|
|
|
|
// The expiring account should be returned
|
|
nextExpiringAccountId = SecurityPolicy.findShortestExpiration(mMockContext);
|
|
assertEquals(a2.mId, nextExpiringAccountId);
|
|
|
|
// Add an account with a longer expiration
|
|
Account a3 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expiring-3", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p3 = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 60, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p3.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a3, "0");
|
|
|
|
// The original expiring account (a2) should be returned
|
|
nextExpiringAccountId = SecurityPolicy.findShortestExpiration(mMockContext);
|
|
assertEquals(a2.mId, nextExpiringAccountId);
|
|
|
|
// Add an account with a shorter expiration
|
|
Account a4 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expiring-4", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p4 = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 15, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p4.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a4, "0");
|
|
|
|
// The new expiring account (a4) should be returned
|
|
nextExpiringAccountId = SecurityPolicy.findShortestExpiration(mMockContext);
|
|
assertEquals(a4.mId, nextExpiringAccountId);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Lightweight subclass of the Controller class allows injection of mock context
|
|
*/
|
|
public static class TestController extends Controller {
|
|
|
|
protected TestController(Context providerContext, Context systemContext) {
|
|
super(systemContext);
|
|
setProviderContext(providerContext);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test the scanner that wipes expiring accounts
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testWipeExpiringAccounts() {
|
|
mSecurityPolicy = SecurityPolicy.getInstance(mMockContext);
|
|
TestController testController = new TestController(mMockContext, getContext());
|
|
|
|
// Two accounts - a1 is normal, a2 has security (but no expiration)
|
|
Account a1 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expired-1", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Account a2 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expired-2", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p2 = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 0, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p2.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a2, "0");
|
|
|
|
// Add a mailbox & messages to each account
|
|
long account1Id = a1.mId;
|
|
long account2Id = a2.mId;
|
|
Mailbox box1 = ProviderTestUtils.setupMailbox("box1", account1Id, true, mMockContext);
|
|
long box1Id = box1.mId;
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupMessage("message1", account1Id, box1Id, false, true, mMockContext);
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupMessage("message2", account1Id, box1Id, false, true, mMockContext);
|
|
Mailbox box2 = ProviderTestUtils.setupMailbox("box2", account2Id, true, mMockContext);
|
|
long box2Id = box2.mId;
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupMessage("message3", account2Id, box2Id, false, true, mMockContext);
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupMessage("message4", account2Id, box2Id, false, true, mMockContext);
|
|
|
|
// Run the expiration code - should do nothing
|
|
boolean wiped = SecurityPolicy.wipeExpiredAccounts(mMockContext, testController);
|
|
assertFalse(wiped);
|
|
// check mailboxes & messages not wiped
|
|
assertEquals(2, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Account.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
assertEquals(2, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Mailbox.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
assertEquals(4, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Message.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
|
|
// Add 3rd account that really expires
|
|
Account a3 = ProviderTestUtils.setupAccount("expired-3", true, mMockContext);
|
|
Policy p3 = setupPolicy(20, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 25, 26, false, 30, 0, 0,
|
|
false, false);
|
|
p3.setAccountPolicy(mMockContext, a3, "0");
|
|
|
|
// Add mailbox & messages to 3rd account
|
|
long account3Id = a3.mId;
|
|
Mailbox box3 = ProviderTestUtils.setupMailbox("box3", account3Id, true, mMockContext);
|
|
long box3Id = box3.mId;
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupMessage("message5", account3Id, box3Id, false, true, mMockContext);
|
|
ProviderTestUtils.setupMessage("message6", account3Id, box3Id, false, true, mMockContext);
|
|
|
|
// check new counts
|
|
assertEquals(3, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Account.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
assertEquals(3, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Mailbox.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
assertEquals(6, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Message.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
|
|
// Run the expiration code - wipe acct #3
|
|
wiped = SecurityPolicy.wipeExpiredAccounts(mMockContext, testController);
|
|
assertTrue(wiped);
|
|
// check new counts - account survives but data is wiped
|
|
assertEquals(3, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Account.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
assertEquals(2, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Mailbox.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
assertEquals(4, EmailContent.count(mMockContext, Message.CONTENT_URI));
|
|
|
|
// Check security hold states - only #3 should be in hold
|
|
Account account = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, account1Id);
|
|
assertEquals(0, account.mFlags & Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD);
|
|
account = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, account2Id);
|
|
assertEquals(0, account.mFlags & Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD);
|
|
account = Account.restoreAccountWithId(mMockContext, account3Id);
|
|
assertEquals(Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD, account.mFlags & Account.FLAGS_SECURITY_HOLD);
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test the code that clears unsupported policies
|
|
* TODO inject a mock DPM so we can directly control & test all cases, no matter what device
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testClearUnsupportedPolicies() {
|
|
Policy p1 =
|
|
setupPolicy(1, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 3, 4, true, 7, 8, 9, false, false);
|
|
Policy p2 =
|
|
setupPolicy(1, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 3, 4, true, 7, 8, 9, true, false);
|
|
Policy p3 =
|
|
setupPolicy(1, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 3, 4, true, 7, 8, 9, false, true);
|
|
|
|
mSecurityPolicy = SecurityPolicy.getInstance(mMockContext);
|
|
DevicePolicyManager dpm = mSecurityPolicy.getDPM();
|
|
boolean hasEncryption =
|
|
dpm.getStorageEncryptionStatus() != DevicePolicyManager.ENCRYPTION_STATUS_UNSUPPORTED;
|
|
|
|
Policy p1Result = mSecurityPolicy.clearUnsupportedPolicies(p1);
|
|
Policy p2Result = mSecurityPolicy.clearUnsupportedPolicies(p2);
|
|
Policy p3Result = mSecurityPolicy.clearUnsupportedPolicies(p3);
|
|
|
|
// No changes expected when encryptionRequested bits were false
|
|
assertEquals(p1, p1Result);
|
|
if (hasEncryption) {
|
|
// No changes expected
|
|
// NOTE: TODO: Modify to check for external encryption cleared on devices that
|
|
// won't support it (e.g. having only unencrypted, removable storage.)
|
|
assertEquals(p2, p2Result);
|
|
assertEquals(p3, p3Result);
|
|
} else {
|
|
// If encryption is unsupported, encryption policy bits are cleared
|
|
Policy policyExpect =
|
|
setupPolicy(1, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, 3, 4, true, 7, 8, 9, false,
|
|
false);
|
|
assertEquals(policyExpect, p2Result);
|
|
assertEquals(policyExpect, p3Result);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Test the code that converts from exchange-style quality to DPM/Lockscreen style quality.
|
|
*/
|
|
public void testGetDPManagerPasswordQuality() {
|
|
// Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE -> DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_UNSPECIFIED
|
|
Policy p1 = setupPolicy(0, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE,
|
|
0, 0, false, 0, 0, 0, false, false);
|
|
assertEquals(DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_UNSPECIFIED,
|
|
p1.getDPManagerPasswordQuality());
|
|
|
|
// PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE -> PASSWORD_QUALITY_NUMERIC
|
|
Policy p2 = setupPolicy(4, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE,
|
|
0, 0, false, 0, 0, 0, false, false);
|
|
assertEquals(DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_NUMERIC,
|
|
p2.getDPManagerPasswordQuality());
|
|
|
|
// PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG -> PASSWORD_QUALITY_ALPHANUMERIC
|
|
Policy p3 = setupPolicy(4, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG,
|
|
0, 0, false, 0, 0, 0, false, false);
|
|
assertEquals(DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_ALPHANUMERIC,
|
|
p3.getDPManagerPasswordQuality());
|
|
|
|
// PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG + complex chars -> PASSWORD_QUALITY_COMPLEX
|
|
Policy p4 = setupPolicy(4, Policy.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG,
|
|
0, 0, false, 0, 0 , 2, false, false);
|
|
assertEquals(DevicePolicyManager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_COMPLEX,
|
|
p4.getDPManagerPasswordQuality());
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
private boolean policySetEqualsPolicy(PolicySet ps, Policy policy) {
|
|
if ((ps.mPasswordMode >> LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_SHIFT) != policy.mPasswordMode) {
|
|
return false;
|
|
}
|
|
if (ps.mMinPasswordLength != policy.mPasswordMinLength) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mPasswordComplexChars != policy.mPasswordComplexChars) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mPasswordHistory != policy.mPasswordHistory) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mPasswordExpirationDays != policy.mPasswordExpirationDays) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mMaxPasswordFails != policy.mPasswordMaxFails) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mMaxScreenLockTime != policy.mMaxScreenLockTime) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mRequireRemoteWipe != policy.mRequireRemoteWipe) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mRequireEncryption != policy.mRequireEncryption) return false;
|
|
if (ps.mRequireEncryptionExternal != policy.mRequireEncryptionExternal) return false;
|
|
return true;
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
public void testPolicyFlagsToPolicy() {
|
|
// Policy flags; the three sets included here correspond to policies for three test
|
|
// accounts that, between them, use all of the possible policies
|
|
long flags = 67096612L;
|
|
PolicySet ps = new PolicySet(flags);
|
|
Policy policy = LegacyPolicySet.flagsToPolicy(flags);
|
|
assertTrue(policySetEqualsPolicy(ps, policy));
|
|
flags = 52776591691846L;
|
|
ps = new PolicySet(flags);
|
|
policy = LegacyPolicySet.flagsToPolicy(flags);
|
|
assertTrue(policySetEqualsPolicy(ps, policy));
|
|
flags = 1689605957029924L;
|
|
ps = new PolicySet(flags);
|
|
policy = LegacyPolicySet.flagsToPolicy(flags);
|
|
assertTrue(policySetEqualsPolicy(ps, policy));
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* The old PolicySet class fields and constructor; we use this to test conversion to the
|
|
* new Policy table scheme
|
|
*/
|
|
private static class PolicySet {
|
|
private final int mMinPasswordLength;
|
|
private final int mPasswordMode;
|
|
private final int mMaxPasswordFails;
|
|
private final int mMaxScreenLockTime;
|
|
private final boolean mRequireRemoteWipe;
|
|
private final int mPasswordExpirationDays;
|
|
private final int mPasswordHistory;
|
|
private final int mPasswordComplexChars;
|
|
private final boolean mRequireEncryption;
|
|
private final boolean mRequireEncryptionExternal;
|
|
|
|
/**
|
|
* Create from values encoded in an account flags int
|
|
*/
|
|
private PolicySet(long flags) {
|
|
mMinPasswordLength = (int) ((flags & LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_LENGTH_MASK)
|
|
>> LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_LENGTH_SHIFT);
|
|
mPasswordMode =
|
|
(int) (flags & LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_MASK);
|
|
mMaxPasswordFails = (int) ((flags & LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_MAX_FAILS_MASK)
|
|
>> LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_MAX_FAILS_SHIFT);
|
|
mMaxScreenLockTime = (int) ((flags & LegacyPolicySet.SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_MASK)
|
|
>> LegacyPolicySet.SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_SHIFT);
|
|
mRequireRemoteWipe = 0 != (flags & LegacyPolicySet.REQUIRE_REMOTE_WIPE);
|
|
mPasswordExpirationDays = (int) ((flags & LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_EXPIRATION_MASK)
|
|
>> LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_EXPIRATION_SHIFT);
|
|
mPasswordHistory = (int) ((flags & LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_HISTORY_MASK)
|
|
>> LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_HISTORY_SHIFT);
|
|
mPasswordComplexChars = (int) ((flags & LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_COMPLEX_CHARS_MASK)
|
|
>> LegacyPolicySet.PASSWORD_COMPLEX_CHARS_SHIFT);
|
|
mRequireEncryption = 0 != (flags & LegacyPolicySet.REQUIRE_ENCRYPTION);
|
|
mRequireEncryptionExternal = 0 != (flags & LegacyPolicySet.REQUIRE_ENCRYPTION_EXTERNAL);
|
|
}
|
|
}
|
|
}
|