* We need to call this out to the user (a surprised user is an
unhappy user)
* Required for fix to bug referenced below
Bug: 5533550
Change-Id: I64a870a703de7e02ce882aefc3636a1668021eb8
* We need to call this out to the user (a surprised user is an
unhappy user)
* Required for fix to bug referenced below
Bug: 5533550
Change-Id: I7da337057b9b28300ddd485283920e12c1ae53da
* Remove PolicyService APIs policiesRequired, policiesUpdated,
isSupported, clearUnsupportedPolicies, and isActiveAdmin
* Add PolicyService API setAccountPolicy, which is the sole
method by which security policies are promulgated
* Add protocolPoliciesEnabled and protocolPoliciesUnsupported
to the Policy class; these are packed, localized strings
indicating policies that the protocol itself have enabled
and/or cannot support (i.e. these are policies that are
unknown to the DPM, e.g. don't load attachments)
* Differentiate in security notifications between three kinds
of policy changes - changes that don't require user
intervention (e.g. reducing requirements), changes that
require user intervention (the legacy notification), and
changes that make the account unsyncable (e.g. the server
adding an unsupportable policy). Handle all possible policy
changes cleanly.
* Make security notifications per account (with multiple
accounts, notifications would get arbitrarily munged)
* Expose ALL enforced policies via the account settings
screen in two categories: policies enforced (including
both policies enforced by the DPM and policies enforced
by the protocol) and policies unsupported (note that these
can only be seen if policies are changed after an account
is created; we do not allow the creation of an account
when any required policies are unsupported). Add a
button that forces a sync attempt, for accounts that
are locked out, but whose policies have changed on
the server (this would otherwise require a reboot).
* Updated unit tests
Bug: 5398682
Bug: 5393724
Bug: 5379682
Change-Id: I4a3df823913a809874ed959d228177f0fc799281
There were two issues:
- the default account ID from the provider wasn't consistent: it was
using a snapshot from the cached data but that simply returns a Map, and
the values aren't guaranteed to be sorted (and indeed I saw that the
order was different on consecutive calls!)
- hitting app up from Compose always just kicked you out to the inbox
for the default account, but it probably should have used the account of
the compose screen, since it can be specified in the Intent
Bug: 5012008
Change-Id: Ic9a753b261e047790453bc1a9417bc0c6d2f87f9
There were two places where account flags were being set on setup: one
was in manual setup when the user selected the account type
(pop/imap/eas), and another was when it was automatically determined
from XML. The two paths were inconsistent and one was setting bits like
SUPPORTS_SEARCH but the other wasn't.
This fixes being able to search in IMAP
Bug: 5011932
Change-Id: I50eada7485aaef4e2a85d25fa7eb9ac7ab03093a
* Guarantee that up to 16 Account (with HostAuths), and Policy rows
are always cached. Also, 6 commonly used Mailboxes per Account
(Inbox, Outbox, Drafts, Sent, Trash, and Search)
* Precache these rows when EmailProvider starts up
* Ensure that newly added, precachable rows are cached when created
* Clean up some inefficient/wrong caching code
* Fix a commonly called method in NotificationManager in which we
load a single Mailbox row using selection vs withAppendedId
* Confirm that we don't read from the database in typical use and
heavy message loading
* Add a special URI for finding mailbox by type (using the cache)
* Add special-case code for EmailContent.count(Account.CONTENT_URI)
which is used in a number of places (including on the UI thread)
and whose value is easily determined
* Add a special URI to get the default account id
* Confirm that all unit tests work
The goal here is to be able to load all Account, HostAuth, Policy,
and Mailbox objects (by id) without worrying about disk access.
There will still be a single disk read for uncommon Mailbox reads,
but this should be considered acceptable.
Change-Id: Ibc9aa7acc73185e360b0b6f3053b90a985e97210
TODO: Unit tests
* Also, a convenience method to test the base flag
* Follow-up CL will add these flags for Exchange
Change-Id: I38dc1d19e89805989e674c17919db238b4913a1c
Paul Westbrook