This version is hybrid of the old design and what Andy's suggested.
- MessageViewFragment is responsible to show a single message at a time.
- Call MVF.openMessage() to tell it to open another message.
No need to re-create a new MVF to do this.
- MessageView manages the message list, and handles "move-to-newer/older"
buttons.
Reason for not re-creating a fragment when opening another message is:
- Re-using the same fragment doesn't make it as complecated/ugly as I
was initially afraid.
It's basically cancelling all running tasks, re-initializee some views,
and load a message.
- We don't have to run MVF.onCreate() over and over again when moving through
messages.
We may change the strategy later, but I think it's suffice for now.
(Changing this might affect how the back key works, so let's revisit it
when the fragment manager supports back.)
Basically this CL is all about internal changes.
No UI should have changed except for:
- Moved "Move to newer/older" buttons to the bottom.
Also fixes:
Bug: 2849129
Change-Id: I00c05069231afded9d98d3d52dd9a7925ebdee9d
This is a lightweight placeholder so calendar functionality can be
tested. Simply presents a message about the invitation, and a set of
yes/maybe/no buttons to click.
The UI is shown whenever the message appears to contain an invite.
There are many elements left to be done here:
TODO: response code (EAS protocol) doesn't seem to work
TODO: use real assets & design
TODO: provide a click-link into calendar event
TODO: show calendar icon in messagelist too
TODO: (if possible) persist user's response in button state?
* Shown next to subject (non-final layout)
* Value taken from provider data
* Tapping star toggles state
* State writes back to provider
NOTE: I am currently doing the provider writeback via direct provider
calls (using the synced-message URI) but not doing it with a service call,
so at this point there is no triggering of any server-side update.
However a sync engine might "discover" the change.
NOTE: I made a global change of "mMessage" to "mOldMessage" because
there is still a lot of legacy code in MessageView and I wanted to clearly
demarcate the code that still needs to be redone.
