On exchange servers that support "smart reply", the original message is
actually appended by the server. In this situation, we should not append
the original HTML text on the client.
bug 4177192
Change-Id: I0bdb34cf837e0cc0bfac8917f993ecb764814d97
* We needed to set DevicePolicyMnager.PASSWORD_QUALITY_COMPLEX
* Setting this, we also need to clear some of the defaults for complex
mode that are not correct for Exchange's definition of "complex".
* Unit tests
Bug: 4092218
Change-Id: Iea7bd05d48f1aa9406222c1db5937cfd7f2662b8
Inline images can be specified in two different ways -- explicitly with a
Content-Disposition of "inline" or implicitly with no Content-Disposition.
We correctly handled the former. For the later, we now default to an "inline"
disposition if one was not specified. This is acceptable per RFC 822 which
states:
Content-Disposition is an optional header field. In its absence,
the MUA may use whatever presentation method it deems suitable.
Additionally, if the disposition is not specified by the server, we need to
look at the Content-Type header for the file name.
bug 2824698
Change-Id: I146f7a67197b4e737e5f82a3d570e0f74e23fa35
* If we read a null deviceName, delete the file and create a
new one.
Bug: 3506362
Backport of Ida670db2f4b75cb9c94636a0af541ae5df50addf
Change-Id: If844fe2a2f3d7096a8b18e826a3640a7d9dff830
To determine mime-types of attachments from the ACTION_SEND and _MULTIPLE intents,
- Use ContentResolver.getType() for content: URIs
- Use inferMimeType() for file: URIs
Tested with Gallary and Downloads.
Bug 3510624
Backport of Ibfa4b383463f157e18fd634e55f5be4b9adf6aa5
Change-Id: Id2815738673f3822a97e92414b84f6a5d46eb96f
When replying or fowarding an HTML message, we now send both plain text and
HTML bodies as a multi-part mime message. We take special care to ensure the
message bodies are in their own multi-part block and do not interfere with
any additional attachments to the message.
bug 3060920
Backport-Of: I2fc3cb4e1f65bcc28486a62731b44b0ee0a99719
Change-Id: I89ec2795b55ceb7472a8ee3db2dc8f50cf537d9c
The new class EmailAsyncTask might look overkill, but
this is what I've been wanting for long time.
In many activities we store all AsyncTasks we start to member fields
so that we can cancel them in onDestroy(). (e.g.
MessageViewFragmentBase.mLoadMessageTask and mReloadMessageTask)
With EmailAsyncTask these fields will no longer be necessary.
We'll be able to just fire up as many AsyncTasks as we want, and clean them
up in onDestroy() with just cancellAllInterrupt().
Bug 3480136
Backport of Id8aa1ba1500eee58cfab8b562b95e9ed852b3e29
Change-Id: I2d2966ff878862a5246c031d1d4e221da5a7e81a
* This is is a minimal implementation that only supports the external
encryption policy when there is no physical/removable storage, and
the emulated external storage is located within an encrypted backing
store.
Bug: 3351426
Change-Id: Id96e9277f810beeebf816a914acd3d733eb713ea
For now it only enables it for the main process. I've added a flag
to EmailServiceProxy for EAS, but it's not used in the exchange side.
Bug 3500292
Change-Id: I5b27c69fe7cc995a430e9def54b2463076032c78
Slight API change to make it more clear what the method parameter is for.
Also add some additonal test conditions to the Rfc822Output tests.
Reapply changes in CL https://android-git.corp.google.com/g/#change,99090
Change-Id: I7a48c9544e48cbdf44b14f4b1f8d92fe01f7861e
