Backport: Handle "Allow non-provisionable devices" properly
* Backport from master branch * Send policy key of "0" when validating; this gets us the policies even if "Allow..." is enabled (currently, we simply don't see the policies) * If we don't support all of the policies, send back the response code indicating support for partial support. If we get a positive response back, then we're good to go - the server allows devices with partial support. Otherwise, we fail as we always have - with the toast indicating that the device doesn't support required policies * Remove PolicySet.isSupported() and ensure proper field ranges within the constructor * Update tests as appropriate Bug: 2759782 Change-Id: Ida5663a9b35c75ecc61a5f442be0bd60b433cb73
This commit is contained in:
parent
e43b11ba3e
commit
8b36acb10d
@ -74,15 +74,6 @@ public class SecurityPolicy {
|
||||
private static final int ACCOUNT_FLAGS_COLUMN_ID = 0;
|
||||
private static final int ACCOUNT_FLAGS_COLUMN_FLAGS = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* These are hardcoded limits based on knowledge of the current DevicePolicyManager
|
||||
* and screen lock mechanisms. Wherever possible, these should be replaced with queries of
|
||||
* dynamic capabilities of the device (e.g. what password modes are supported?)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private static final int LIMIT_MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH = 16;
|
||||
private static final int LIMIT_PASSWORD_MODE = PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG;
|
||||
private static final int LIMIT_SCREENLOCK_TIME = PolicySet.SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_MAX;
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Get the security policy instance
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -188,33 +179,6 @@ public class SecurityPolicy {
|
||||
return mDPM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* API: Query used to determine if a given policy is "possible" (irrespective of current
|
||||
* device state. This is used when creating new accounts.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* TODO: This is hardcoded based on knowledge of the current DevicePolicyManager
|
||||
* and screen lock mechanisms. It would be nice to replace these tests with something
|
||||
* more dynamic.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @param policies the policies requested
|
||||
* @return true if the policies are supported, false if not supported
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public boolean isSupported(PolicySet policies) {
|
||||
if (policies.mMinPasswordLength > LIMIT_MIN_PASSWORD_LENGTH) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (policies.mPasswordMode > LIMIT_PASSWORD_MODE ) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// No limit on password fail count
|
||||
if (policies.mMaxScreenLockTime > LIMIT_SCREENLOCK_TIME ) {
|
||||
return false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
// No limit on remote wipe capable
|
||||
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* API: Report that policies may have been updated due to rewriting values in an Account.
|
||||
* @param accountId the account that has been updated, -1 if unknown/deleted
|
||||
@ -435,7 +399,6 @@ public class SecurityPolicy {
|
||||
private static final int PASSWORD_LENGTH_MASK = 31;
|
||||
private static final int PASSWORD_LENGTH_SHIFT = 0;
|
||||
public static final int PASSWORD_LENGTH_MAX = 30;
|
||||
private static final int PASSWORD_LENGTH_EXCEEDED = 31;
|
||||
// bits 5..8: password mode
|
||||
private static final int PASSWORD_MODE_SHIFT = 5;
|
||||
private static final int PASSWORD_MODE_MASK = 15 << PASSWORD_MODE_SHIFT;
|
||||
@ -453,11 +416,31 @@ public class SecurityPolicy {
|
||||
// bit 25: remote wipe capability required
|
||||
private static final int REQUIRE_REMOTE_WIPE = 1 << 25;
|
||||
|
||||
public final int mMinPasswordLength;
|
||||
public final int mPasswordMode;
|
||||
public final int mMaxPasswordFails;
|
||||
public final int mMaxScreenLockTime;
|
||||
public final boolean mRequireRemoteWipe;
|
||||
/*package*/ final int mMinPasswordLength;
|
||||
/*package*/ final int mPasswordMode;
|
||||
/*package*/ final int mMaxPasswordFails;
|
||||
/*package*/ final int mMaxScreenLockTime;
|
||||
/*package*/ final boolean mRequireRemoteWipe;
|
||||
|
||||
public int getMinPasswordLength() {
|
||||
return mMinPasswordLength;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getPasswordMode() {
|
||||
return mPasswordMode;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getMaxPasswordFails() {
|
||||
return mMaxPasswordFails;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public int getMaxScreenLockTime() {
|
||||
return mMaxScreenLockTime;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public boolean isRequireRemoteWipe() {
|
||||
return mRequireRemoteWipe;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Create from raw values.
|
||||
@ -470,15 +453,17 @@ public class SecurityPolicy {
|
||||
*/
|
||||
public PolicySet(int minPasswordLength, int passwordMode, int maxPasswordFails,
|
||||
int maxScreenLockTime, boolean requireRemoteWipe) throws IllegalArgumentException {
|
||||
// This value has a hard limit which cannot be supported if exceeded. Setting the
|
||||
// exceeded value will force isSupported() to return false.
|
||||
// Check against hard limits
|
||||
// EAS doesn't generate values outside these limits anyway
|
||||
if (minPasswordLength > PASSWORD_LENGTH_MAX) {
|
||||
minPasswordLength = PASSWORD_LENGTH_EXCEEDED;
|
||||
throw new IllegalArgumentException("password length");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (passwordMode < PASSWORD_MODE_NONE
|
||||
|| passwordMode > PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG) {
|
||||
if (passwordMode < PASSWORD_MODE_NONE || passwordMode > PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG) {
|
||||
throw new IllegalArgumentException("password mode");
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (maxScreenLockTime > SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_MAX) {
|
||||
throw new IllegalArgumentException("screen lock time");
|
||||
}
|
||||
// This value can be reduced (which actually increases security) if necessary
|
||||
if (maxPasswordFails > PASSWORD_MAX_FAILS_MAX) {
|
||||
maxPasswordFails = PASSWORD_MAX_FAILS_MAX;
|
||||
|
@ -172,12 +172,17 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
// MSFT's custom HTTP result code indicating the need to provision
|
||||
static private final int HTTP_NEED_PROVISIONING = 449;
|
||||
|
||||
// The EAS protocol Provision status for "we implement all of the policies"
|
||||
static private final String PROVISION_STATUS_OK = "1";
|
||||
// The EAS protocol Provision status meaning "we partially implement the policies"
|
||||
static private final String PROVISION_STATUS_PARTIAL = "2";
|
||||
|
||||
// Reasonable default
|
||||
public String mProtocolVersion = Eas.DEFAULT_PROTOCOL_VERSION;
|
||||
public Double mProtocolVersionDouble;
|
||||
protected String mDeviceId = null;
|
||||
private String mDeviceType = "Android";
|
||||
private String mAuthString = null;
|
||||
/*package*/ String mDeviceType = "Android";
|
||||
/*package*/ String mAuthString = null;
|
||||
private String mCmdString = null;
|
||||
public String mHostAddress;
|
||||
public String mUserName;
|
||||
@ -775,8 +780,7 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
* TODO: make watchdog actually work (it doesn't understand our service w/Mailbox == 0)
|
||||
* TODO: figure out why sendHttpClientPost() hangs - possibly pool exhaustion
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static public GalResult searchGal(Context context, long accountId, String filter)
|
||||
{
|
||||
static public GalResult searchGal(Context context, long accountId, String filter) {
|
||||
Account acct = SyncManager.getAccountById(accountId);
|
||||
if (acct != null) {
|
||||
HostAuth ha = HostAuth.restoreHostAuthWithId(context, acct.mHostAuthKeyRecv);
|
||||
@ -1102,18 +1106,21 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
* @param method the method we are going to send
|
||||
* @param usePolicyKey whether or not a policy key should be sent in the headers
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private void setHeaders(HttpRequestBase method, boolean usePolicyKey) {
|
||||
/*package*/ void setHeaders(HttpRequestBase method, boolean usePolicyKey) {
|
||||
method.setHeader("Authorization", mAuthString);
|
||||
method.setHeader("MS-ASProtocolVersion", mProtocolVersion);
|
||||
method.setHeader("Connection", "keep-alive");
|
||||
method.setHeader("User-Agent", mDeviceType + '/' + Eas.VERSION);
|
||||
if (usePolicyKey && (mAccount != null)) {
|
||||
String key = mAccount.mSecuritySyncKey;
|
||||
if (key == null || key.length() == 0) {
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (Eas.PARSER_LOG) {
|
||||
userLog("Policy key: " , key);
|
||||
if (usePolicyKey) {
|
||||
// If there's an account in existence, use its key; otherwise (we're creating the
|
||||
// account), send "0". The server will respond with code 449 if there are policies
|
||||
// to be enforced
|
||||
String key = "0";
|
||||
if (mAccount != null) {
|
||||
String accountKey = mAccount.mSecuritySyncKey;
|
||||
if (!TextUtils.isEmpty(accountKey)) {
|
||||
key = accountKey;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
method.setHeader("X-MS-PolicyKey", key);
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1280,7 +1287,7 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
} else if (sp.isActive(ps)) {
|
||||
// See if the required policies are in force; if they are, acknowledge the policies
|
||||
// to the server and get the final policy key
|
||||
String policyKey = acknowledgeProvision(pp.getPolicyKey());
|
||||
String policyKey = acknowledgeProvision(pp.getPolicyKey(), PROVISION_STATUS_OK);
|
||||
if (policyKey != null) {
|
||||
// Write the final policy key to the Account and say we've been successful
|
||||
ps.writeAccount(mAccount, policyKey, true, mContext);
|
||||
@ -1317,15 +1324,20 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
InputStream is = resp.getEntity().getContent();
|
||||
ProvisionParser pp = new ProvisionParser(is, this);
|
||||
if (pp.parse()) {
|
||||
// If true, we received policies from the server; see if they are supported by
|
||||
// the framework; if so, return the ProvisionParser containing the policy set and
|
||||
// temporary key
|
||||
PolicySet ps = pp.getPolicySet();
|
||||
// The PolicySet can be null if there are policies we don't know about (e.g. ones
|
||||
// from Exchange 12.1) If we have a PolicySet, then we ask whether the device can
|
||||
// support the actual parameters of those policies.
|
||||
if ((ps != null) && SecurityPolicy.getInstance(mContext).isSupported(ps)) {
|
||||
// The PolicySet in the ProvisionParser will have the requirements for all KNOWN
|
||||
// policies. If others are required, hasSupportablePolicySet will be false
|
||||
if (pp.hasSupportablePolicySet()) {
|
||||
// If the policies are supportable (in this context, meaning that there are no
|
||||
// completely unimplemented policies required), just return the parser itself
|
||||
return pp;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
// Try to acknowledge using the "partial" status (i.e. we can partially
|
||||
// accommodate the required policies). The server will agree to this if the
|
||||
// "allow non-provisionable devices" setting is enabled on the server
|
||||
String policyKey = acknowledgeProvision(pp.getPolicyKey(),
|
||||
PROVISION_STATUS_PARTIAL);
|
||||
// Return either the parser (success) or null (failure)
|
||||
return (policyKey != null) ? pp : null;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1341,14 +1353,15 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
* @throws IOException
|
||||
*/
|
||||
private void acknowledgeRemoteWipe(String tempKey) throws IOException {
|
||||
acknowledgeProvisionImpl(tempKey, true);
|
||||
acknowledgeProvisionImpl(tempKey, PROVISION_STATUS_OK, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private String acknowledgeProvision(String tempKey) throws IOException {
|
||||
return acknowledgeProvisionImpl(tempKey, false);
|
||||
private String acknowledgeProvision(String tempKey, String result) throws IOException {
|
||||
return acknowledgeProvisionImpl(tempKey, result, false);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private String acknowledgeProvisionImpl(String tempKey, boolean remoteWipe) throws IOException {
|
||||
private String acknowledgeProvisionImpl(String tempKey, String status,
|
||||
boolean remoteWipe) throws IOException {
|
||||
Serializer s = new Serializer();
|
||||
s.start(Tags.PROVISION_PROVISION).start(Tags.PROVISION_POLICIES);
|
||||
s.start(Tags.PROVISION_POLICY);
|
||||
@ -1357,11 +1370,11 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
s.data(Tags.PROVISION_POLICY_TYPE, getPolicyType());
|
||||
|
||||
s.data(Tags.PROVISION_POLICY_KEY, tempKey);
|
||||
s.data(Tags.PROVISION_STATUS, "1");
|
||||
s.data(Tags.PROVISION_STATUS, status);
|
||||
s.end().end(); // PROVISION_POLICY, PROVISION_POLICIES
|
||||
if (remoteWipe) {
|
||||
s.start(Tags.PROVISION_REMOTE_WIPE);
|
||||
s.data(Tags.PROVISION_STATUS, "1");
|
||||
s.data(Tags.PROVISION_STATUS, PROVISION_STATUS_OK);
|
||||
s.end();
|
||||
}
|
||||
s.end().done(); // PROVISION_PROVISION
|
||||
@ -1371,7 +1384,7 @@ public class EasSyncService extends AbstractSyncService {
|
||||
InputStream is = resp.getEntity().getContent();
|
||||
ProvisionParser pp = new ProvisionParser(is, this);
|
||||
if (pp.parse()) {
|
||||
// Return the final polic key from the ProvisionParser
|
||||
// Return the final policy key from the ProvisionParser
|
||||
return pp.getPolicyKey();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -37,11 +37,11 @@ public class ProvisionParser extends Parser {
|
||||
PolicySet mPolicySet = null;
|
||||
String mPolicyKey = null;
|
||||
boolean mRemoteWipe = false;
|
||||
boolean mIsSupportable = true;
|
||||
|
||||
public ProvisionParser(InputStream in, EasSyncService service) throws IOException {
|
||||
super(in);
|
||||
mService = service;
|
||||
setDebug(true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public PolicySet getPolicySet() {
|
||||
@ -56,12 +56,16 @@ public class ProvisionParser extends Parser {
|
||||
return mRemoteWipe;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void parseProvisionDocWbxml() throws IOException {
|
||||
public boolean hasSupportablePolicySet() {
|
||||
return (mPolicySet != null) && mIsSupportable;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
private void parseProvisionDocWbxml() throws IOException {
|
||||
int minPasswordLength = 0;
|
||||
int passwordMode = PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE;
|
||||
int maxPasswordFails = 0;
|
||||
int maxScreenLockTime = 0;
|
||||
boolean canSupport = true;
|
||||
boolean supported = true;
|
||||
|
||||
while (nextTag(Tags.PROVISION_EAS_PROVISION_DOC) != END) {
|
||||
switch (tag) {
|
||||
@ -95,7 +99,7 @@ public class ProvisionParser extends Parser {
|
||||
// The following policy, if false, can't be supported at the moment
|
||||
case Tags.PROVISION_ATTACHMENTS_ENABLED:
|
||||
if (getValueInt() == 0) {
|
||||
canSupport = false;
|
||||
supported = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
// The following policies, if true, can't be supported at the moment
|
||||
@ -105,18 +109,21 @@ public class ProvisionParser extends Parser {
|
||||
case Tags.PROVISION_DEVICE_PASSWORD_HISTORY:
|
||||
case Tags.PROVISION_MAX_ATTACHMENT_SIZE:
|
||||
if (getValueInt() == 1) {
|
||||
canSupport = false;
|
||||
supported = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
skipTag();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!supported) {
|
||||
log("Policy not supported: " + tag);
|
||||
mIsSupportable = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (canSupport) {
|
||||
mPolicySet = new SecurityPolicy.PolicySet(minPasswordLength, passwordMode,
|
||||
mPolicySet = new SecurityPolicy.PolicySet(minPasswordLength, passwordMode,
|
||||
maxPasswordFails, maxScreenLockTime, true);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
class ShadowPolicySet {
|
||||
@ -318,10 +325,10 @@ public class ProvisionParser extends Parser {
|
||||
case Tags.PROVISION_STATUS:
|
||||
int status = getValueInt();
|
||||
mService.userLog("Provision status: ", status);
|
||||
res = (status == 1);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case Tags.PROVISION_POLICIES:
|
||||
parsePolicies();
|
||||
res = (mPolicySet != null) || (mPolicyKey != null);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
case Tags.PROVISION_REMOTE_WIPE:
|
||||
// Indicate remote wipe command received
|
||||
|
@ -88,6 +88,27 @@ public class SecurityPolicyTests extends ProviderTestCase2<EmailProvider> {
|
||||
return sp;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testPolicySetConstructor() {
|
||||
// We know that EMPTY_POLICY_SET doesn't generate an Exception or we wouldn't be here
|
||||
// Try some illegal parameters
|
||||
try {
|
||||
new PolicySet(100, PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE, 0, 0, false);
|
||||
fail("Too-long password allowed");
|
||||
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
try {
|
||||
new PolicySet(0, PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG + 1, 0, 0, false);
|
||||
fail("Illegal password mode allowed");
|
||||
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
try {
|
||||
new PolicySet(0, PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE, 0,
|
||||
PolicySet.SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_MAX + 1, false);
|
||||
fail("Too-long screen lock time allowed");
|
||||
} catch (IllegalArgumentException e) {
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test business logic of aggregating accounts with policies
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@ -214,27 +235,6 @@ public class SecurityPolicyTests extends ProviderTestCase2<EmailProvider> {
|
||||
assertTrue(p.mRequireRemoteWipe);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test creation of policies with unsupported ranges
|
||||
*/
|
||||
@SmallTest
|
||||
public void testFieldRanges() {
|
||||
SecurityPolicy sp = getSecurityPolicy();
|
||||
// Overlong password length cannot be supported
|
||||
PolicySet p = new PolicySet(PolicySet.PASSWORD_LENGTH_MAX + 1, 0, 0, 0, false);
|
||||
assertFalse(sp.isSupported(p));
|
||||
|
||||
// Too many wipes before reboot can be supported (by reducing to the max)
|
||||
p = new PolicySet(0, 0, PolicySet.PASSWORD_MAX_FAILS_MAX + 1, 0, false);
|
||||
assertTrue(sp.isSupported(p));
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MAX_FAILS_MAX, p.mMaxPasswordFails);
|
||||
|
||||
// Too long lock time can be supported (by reducing to the max)
|
||||
p = new PolicySet(0, 0, 0, PolicySet.SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_MAX + 1, false);
|
||||
assertTrue(sp.isSupported(p));
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.SCREEN_LOCK_TIME_MAX, p.mMaxScreenLockTime);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
* Test encoding into an Account and out again
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -17,6 +17,12 @@
|
||||
|
||||
package com.android.exchange;
|
||||
|
||||
import com.android.email.provider.EmailContent.Account;
|
||||
|
||||
import org.apache.http.Header;
|
||||
import org.apache.http.client.methods.HttpPost;
|
||||
import org.apache.http.client.methods.HttpRequestBase;
|
||||
|
||||
import android.content.Context;
|
||||
import android.test.AndroidTestCase;
|
||||
|
||||
@ -119,4 +125,41 @@ import java.io.IOException;
|
||||
assertEquals(100, svc.mPingForceHeartbeat);
|
||||
assertFalse(svc.mPingHeartbeatDropped);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testAddHeaders() {
|
||||
HttpRequestBase method = new HttpPost();
|
||||
EasSyncService svc = new EasSyncService();
|
||||
svc.mAuthString = "auth";
|
||||
svc.mProtocolVersion = "12.1";
|
||||
svc.mDeviceType = "android";
|
||||
svc.mAccount = null;
|
||||
// With second argument false, there should be no header
|
||||
svc.setHeaders(method, false);
|
||||
Header[] headers = method.getHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
assertEquals(0, headers.length);
|
||||
// With second argument true, there should always be a header
|
||||
// The value will be "0" without an account
|
||||
method.removeHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
svc.setHeaders(method, true);
|
||||
headers = method.getHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
assertEquals(1, headers.length);
|
||||
assertEquals("0", headers[0].getValue());
|
||||
// With an account, but null security key, the header's value should be "0"
|
||||
Account account = new Account();
|
||||
account.mSecuritySyncKey = null;
|
||||
svc.mAccount = account;
|
||||
method.removeHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
svc.setHeaders(method, true);
|
||||
headers = method.getHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
assertEquals(1, headers.length);
|
||||
assertEquals("0", headers[0].getValue());
|
||||
// With an account and security key, the header's value should be the security key
|
||||
account.mSecuritySyncKey = "key";
|
||||
svc.mAccount = account;
|
||||
method.removeHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
svc.setHeaders(method, true);
|
||||
headers = method.getHeaders("X-MS-PolicyKey");
|
||||
assertEquals(1, headers.length);
|
||||
assertEquals("key", headers[0].getValue());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -113,11 +113,11 @@ public class ProvisionParserTests extends SyncAdapterTestCase {
|
||||
PolicySet ps = parser.getPolicySet();
|
||||
assertNotNull(ps);
|
||||
// Check the settings to make sure they were parsed correctly
|
||||
assertEquals(5*60, ps.mMaxScreenLockTime); // Screen lock time is in seconds
|
||||
assertEquals(8, ps.mMinPasswordLength);
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, ps.mPasswordMode);
|
||||
assertEquals(20, ps.mMaxPasswordFails);
|
||||
assertTrue(ps.mRequireRemoteWipe);
|
||||
assertEquals(5*60, ps.getMaxScreenLockTime()); // Screen lock time is in seconds
|
||||
assertEquals(8, ps.getMinPasswordLength());
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_STRONG, ps.getPasswordMode());
|
||||
assertEquals(20, ps.getMaxPasswordFails());
|
||||
assertTrue(ps.isRequireRemoteWipe());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testWapProvisionParser2() throws IOException {
|
||||
@ -126,7 +126,7 @@ public class ProvisionParserTests extends SyncAdapterTestCase {
|
||||
PolicySet ps = parser.getPolicySet();
|
||||
assertNotNull(ps);
|
||||
// Password should be set to none; others are ignored in this case.
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE, ps.mPasswordMode);
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_NONE, ps.getPasswordMode());
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
public void testWapProvisionParser3() throws IOException {
|
||||
@ -135,10 +135,10 @@ public class ProvisionParserTests extends SyncAdapterTestCase {
|
||||
PolicySet ps = parser.getPolicySet();
|
||||
assertNotNull(ps);
|
||||
// Password should be set to simple
|
||||
assertEquals(2*60, ps.mMaxScreenLockTime); // Screen lock time is in seconds
|
||||
assertEquals(4, ps.mMinPasswordLength);
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, ps.mPasswordMode);
|
||||
assertEquals(5, ps.mMaxPasswordFails);
|
||||
assertTrue(ps.mRequireRemoteWipe);
|
||||
assertEquals(2*60, ps.getMaxScreenLockTime()); // Screen lock time is in seconds
|
||||
assertEquals(4, ps.getMinPasswordLength());
|
||||
assertEquals(PolicySet.PASSWORD_MODE_SIMPLE, ps.getPasswordMode());
|
||||
assertEquals(5, ps.getMaxPasswordFails());
|
||||
assertTrue(ps.isRequireRemoteWipe());
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user