replicant-frameworks_native/libs/ui/tests/InputChannel_test.cpp
Jeff Brown 6cdee9831d Rewrite input transport using sockets.
Since we will not longer be modifying events in place, we don't need
to use an ashmem region for input.  Simplified the code to instead
use a socket of type SOCK_SEQPACKET.

This is part of a series of changes to improve input system pipelining.

Bug: 5963420

Change-Id: I05909075ed8b61b93900913e44c6db84857340d8
2012-02-13 10:28:40 -08:00

155 lines
5.8 KiB
C++

/*
* Copyright (C) 2010 The Android Open Source Project
*
* Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
* you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
* You may obtain a copy of the License at
*
* http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
*
* Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
* distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
* WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
* See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
* limitations under the License.
*/
#include <ui/InputTransport.h>
#include <utils/Timers.h>
#include <utils/StopWatch.h>
#include <gtest/gtest.h>
#include <unistd.h>
#include <time.h>
#include <errno.h>
#include "../../utils/tests/TestHelpers.h"
namespace android {
class InputChannelTest : public testing::Test {
protected:
virtual void SetUp() { }
virtual void TearDown() { }
};
TEST_F(InputChannelTest, ConstructorAndDestructor_TakesOwnershipOfFileDescriptors) {
// Our purpose here is to verify that the input channel destructor closes the
// file descriptor provided to it. One easy way is to provide it with one end
// of a pipe and to check for EPIPE on the other end after the channel is destroyed.
Pipe pipe;
sp<InputChannel> inputChannel = new InputChannel(String8("channel name"), pipe.sendFd);
EXPECT_STREQ("channel name", inputChannel->getName().string())
<< "channel should have provided name";
EXPECT_EQ(pipe.sendFd, inputChannel->getFd())
<< "channel should have provided fd";
inputChannel.clear(); // destroys input channel
EXPECT_EQ(-EPIPE, pipe.readSignal())
<< "channel should have closed fd when destroyed";
// clean up fds of Pipe endpoints that were closed so we don't try to close them again
pipe.sendFd = -1;
}
TEST_F(InputChannelTest, OpenInputChannelPair_ReturnsAPairOfConnectedChannels) {
sp<InputChannel> serverChannel, clientChannel;
status_t result = InputChannel::openInputChannelPair(String8("channel name"),
serverChannel, clientChannel);
ASSERT_EQ(OK, result)
<< "should have successfully opened a channel pair";
// Name
EXPECT_STREQ("channel name (server)", serverChannel->getName().string())
<< "server channel should have suffixed name";
EXPECT_STREQ("channel name (client)", clientChannel->getName().string())
<< "client channel should have suffixed name";
// Server->Client communication
InputMessage serverMsg;
memset(&serverMsg, 0, sizeof(InputMessage));
serverMsg.header.type = InputMessage::TYPE_KEY;
serverMsg.body.key.action = AKEY_EVENT_ACTION_DOWN;
EXPECT_EQ(OK, serverChannel->sendMessage(&serverMsg))
<< "server channel should be able to send message to client channel";
InputMessage clientMsg;
EXPECT_EQ(OK, clientChannel->receiveMessage(&clientMsg))
<< "client channel should be able to receive message from server channel";
EXPECT_EQ(serverMsg.header.type, clientMsg.header.type)
<< "client channel should receive the correct message from server channel";
EXPECT_EQ(serverMsg.body.key.action, clientMsg.body.key.action)
<< "client channel should receive the correct message from server channel";
// Client->Server communication
InputMessage clientReply;
memset(&clientReply, 0, sizeof(InputMessage));
clientReply.header.type = InputMessage::TYPE_FINISHED;
clientReply.body.finished.handled = true;
EXPECT_EQ(OK, clientChannel->sendMessage(&clientReply))
<< "client channel should be able to send message to server channel";
InputMessage serverReply;
EXPECT_EQ(OK, serverChannel->receiveMessage(&serverReply))
<< "server channel should be able to receive message from client channel";
EXPECT_EQ(clientReply.header.type, serverReply.header.type)
<< "server channel should receive the correct message from client channel";
EXPECT_EQ(clientReply.body.finished.handled, serverReply.body.finished.handled)
<< "server channel should receive the correct message from client channel";
}
TEST_F(InputChannelTest, ReceiveSignal_WhenNoSignalPresent_ReturnsAnError) {
sp<InputChannel> serverChannel, clientChannel;
status_t result = InputChannel::openInputChannelPair(String8("channel name"),
serverChannel, clientChannel);
ASSERT_EQ(OK, result)
<< "should have successfully opened a channel pair";
InputMessage msg;
EXPECT_EQ(WOULD_BLOCK, clientChannel->receiveMessage(&msg))
<< "receiveMessage should have returned WOULD_BLOCK";
}
TEST_F(InputChannelTest, ReceiveSignal_WhenPeerClosed_ReturnsAnError) {
sp<InputChannel> serverChannel, clientChannel;
status_t result = InputChannel::openInputChannelPair(String8("channel name"),
serverChannel, clientChannel);
ASSERT_EQ(OK, result)
<< "should have successfully opened a channel pair";
serverChannel.clear(); // close server channel
InputMessage msg;
EXPECT_EQ(DEAD_OBJECT, clientChannel->receiveMessage(&msg))
<< "receiveMessage should have returned DEAD_OBJECT";
}
TEST_F(InputChannelTest, SendSignal_WhenPeerClosed_ReturnsAnError) {
sp<InputChannel> serverChannel, clientChannel;
status_t result = InputChannel::openInputChannelPair(String8("channel name"),
serverChannel, clientChannel);
ASSERT_EQ(OK, result)
<< "should have successfully opened a channel pair";
serverChannel.clear(); // close server channel
InputMessage msg;
msg.header.type = InputMessage::TYPE_KEY;
EXPECT_EQ(DEAD_OBJECT, clientChannel->sendMessage(&msg))
<< "sendMessage should have returned DEAD_OBJECT";
}
} // namespace android