The Java implementation of writing the RPC response header
calculates the length of the header including the 4 bytes
specifying the header length but the native implementation
excludes the 4 bytes specifying the length from the header
length.
The native implementation has been aligned to the Java impl.
Change-Id: I325bf272a63152d8fded4cf4e51a906b5a9bfe19
this would happen when a resize was pending (ie: we have received
and processed a resize transaction but have not received a buffer
with the right size) and a new transaction came in that didn't
involve a resize, for instance a translate-only transaction.
in this case, we would incorrectly update the drawing state
with the pending size, eventhough we still don't have a buffer
for it.
the solution is quite simple, we never allow the size to propagate
from current to drawing state during the regular transaction processing
(unless we are in fixed-size mode -- meaning we don't need to have
a matching size buffer), this propagation happens later once we
receive the buffer.
Bug: 6624163
Change-Id: I11a97e4b88a7f3a0571ddcfe99c86cb04ce01a4d
this allows us to enable h/w acceleration on low-end
devices while keeping memory usage down.
Bug: 6557760
Change-Id: I8af2de3038dc2579360b8b73aa452cb7a0e506a9
This is for a 7in hdpi/tvdpi tablet with 1G of RAM.
That sounds kind-of familiar. I don't know. Have I seen
such a thing before? Maybe.
Bug: 6576049
Change-Id: Iabc245692d5106feec9199eb2b5a3d06e27a9b83
this would happen when a window started with size A, was
resized to B and immediately resized to A. In this situation
the erquested and active size would be the same, and SF
would think a transaction wasn't needed.
we fix this by always comparing the requested sizes.
Also, make sure to set mRefreshPending once we're sure
we have succesfully called updateTexImage().
Bug: 6580962
Change-Id: I2c48b4df7f05fd35c9e1d2dd82095b0f3d5a0b6a
this bug introduced recently would happen when the very first
buffer of a surface was rejected for not having the right size
Bug: 6577035
Change-Id: I9fabf20006019f2a6c308be7c7f5c05bdcfd5014
SurfaceFlinger is using this new feature to reject buffers that
don't have the right size.
Bug: 6498869
Change-Id: I8a7250a47db6c082a357b703feb3b9d0fc8d3443
here we just shuffle a bit the code inside lockPageFlip(),
we move the code that handles the buffer size closer to the call
to updateTexImage(). no functionality change.
Change-Id: Ie3193cd86cd32cf3c89532449fd747d145ca0ab6
use a flag instead of pre-committing the "requested" state
to prevent propagation or "requested" to "active", which makes
things a lot clearer when reading the code.
also avoid going through the "resized" code-path when requested
size is equal to "active" size.
Bug: 6498869
Change-Id: I24f893ba0ec5ca06aac5b8da9818989ae7ce4005
