this means they only have access to the consumer end of
the interface. we had a lot of code that assumed consumers
where holding a BufferQueue (i.e.: both ends), so most of
this change is untangling in fix that
Bug: 9265647
Change-Id: Ic2e2596ee14c7535f51bf26d9a897a0fc036d22c
The previous implementation assumed that the HWC could read and write
the same buffer on frames that involved both GLES and HWC composition.
It turns out some hardware can't do this. The new implementation
maintains a scratch buffer pool to use on these mixed frames, but on
GLES-only or HWC-only frames still does composition directly into the
output buffer.
Bug: 8384764
Change-Id: I7a3addb34fad9bfcbdabbb8b635083e10223df69
HWComposer didn't allow the virtual display output buffer to be set
directly, instead it always used the framebuffer target buffer.
DisplayDevice was only providing the framebuffer release fence to
DisplaySurfaces after a commit.
This change fixes both of these, so both HWComposer and DisplayDevice
should continue to work if VirtualDisplaySurface changes to use
separate framebuffer and output buffers. It's also more correct since
VirtualDisplaySurface uses the correct release fence when queueing the
buffer to the sink.
Bug: 8384764
Change-Id: I95c71e8d4f67705e23f122259ec8dd5dbce70dcf
Previously we only queued a virtual display buffer to the sink when
the next frame was about to be displayed. This may delay the "last"
frame of an animation indefinitely. Now we queue the buffer as soon as
HWC set() returns and gives us the release fence.
Bug: 8384764
Change-Id: I3844a188e0f6ef6ff28f3e11477cfa063a924b1a
DisplayDevice now has a DisplaySurface instead of using
FramebufferSurface directly. FramebufferSurface implements
DisplaySurface, and so does the new VirtualDisplaySurface class.
DisplayDevice now always has a surface, not just for virtual displays.
In this change VirtualDisplaySurface is just a stub; buffers still go
directly from GLES to the final consumer.
Bug: 8384764
Change-Id: I57cb668edbc6c37bfebda90b9222d435bf589f37
