Surface: fix a protected buffer test

This change renames the ScreenshotsOfProtectedBuffersFail to
ScreenshotsOfProtectedBuffersSucceed and changes the test to verify that
the screenshot succeeds.

Change-Id: I960bb8eed4211578cb4dc446b08392937da064b6
This commit is contained in:
Jamie Gennis 2011-10-11 16:02:31 -07:00
parent d76ff352af
commit c901ca0abc

View File

@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceTest, QueuesToWindowComposerIsTrueWhenPurgatorized) {
}
// This test probably doesn't belong here.
TEST_F(SurfaceTest, ScreenshotsOfProtectedBuffersFail) {
TEST_F(SurfaceTest, ScreenshotsOfProtectedBuffersSucceed) {
sp<ANativeWindow> anw(mSurface);
// Verify the screenshot works with no protected buffers.
@ -114,31 +114,8 @@ TEST_F(SurfaceTest, ScreenshotsOfProtectedBuffersFail) {
}
heap = 0;
w = h = fmt = 0;
ASSERT_EQ(INVALID_OPERATION, sf->captureScreen(0, &heap, &w, &h, &fmt,
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, sf->captureScreen(0, &heap, &w, &h, &fmt,
64, 64, 0, 0x7fffffff));
ASSERT_TRUE(heap == NULL);
// XXX: This should not be needed, but it seems that the new buffers don't
// correctly show up after the upcoming dequeue/lock/queue loop without it.
// We should look into this at some point.
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, native_window_set_buffer_count(anw.get(), 3));
// Un-set the PROTECTED usage bit and verify that the screenshot works
// again. Note that we have to change the buffers geometry to ensure that
// the buffers get reallocated, as the new usage bits are a subset of the
// old.
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, native_window_set_usage(anw.get(), 0));
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, native_window_set_buffers_geometry(anw.get(), 32, 32, 0));
for (int i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
// Loop to make sure SurfaceFlinger has retired a protected buffer.
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, anw->dequeueBuffer(anw.get(), &buf));
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, anw->lockBuffer(anw.get(), buf));
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, anw->queueBuffer(anw.get(), buf));
}
heap = 0;
w = h = fmt = 0;
ASSERT_EQ(NO_ERROR, sf->captureScreen(0, &heap, &w, &h, &fmt, 64, 64, 0,
0x7fffffff));
ASSERT_TRUE(heap != NULL);
}