deliver invalidate messages AFTER other messages
because invalidate messages were always handled first, they could prevent other messages to get through entirely. there is no real reason to handle invalidate messages first because the other messages are very uncommon and won't interfer with updates. Change-Id: Ib95cdf35a91407bd2f4d69dd082c5f546e1e0071
This commit is contained in:
parent
aefa57869c
commit
7b0ba16688
|
@ -72,14 +72,6 @@ sp<MessageBase> MessageQueue::waitMessage(nsecs_t timeout)
|
|||
nsecs_t now = systemTime();
|
||||
nsecs_t nextEventTime = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
// invalidate messages are always handled first
|
||||
if (mInvalidate) {
|
||||
mInvalidate = false;
|
||||
mInvalidateMessage->when = now;
|
||||
result = mInvalidateMessage;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
LIST::iterator cur(mMessages.begin());
|
||||
if (cur != mMessages.end()) {
|
||||
result = *cur;
|
||||
|
@ -95,6 +87,14 @@ sp<MessageBase> MessageQueue::waitMessage(nsecs_t timeout)
|
|||
result = 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// see if we have an invalidate message
|
||||
if (mInvalidate) {
|
||||
mInvalidate = false;
|
||||
mInvalidateMessage->when = now;
|
||||
result = mInvalidateMessage;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (timeout >= 0) {
|
||||
if (timeoutTime < now) {
|
||||
// we timed-out, return a NULL message
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue