Don't propagate StrictMode over one-way Binder calls.
This was causing stack stitching problems where a one-way call with violations followed by a two-way call without violations was getting the previous one-way call's violation stack stitched on to the second caller's stack. The solution is a little more indirect than I would've liked (preserving the binder's onTransact flags until enforceInterface) but was seemingly necessary to work without changing the AIDL compiler. It should also be sufficiently cheap, since no new calls to thread-local IPCThreadState lookups were required. The additional work is just same-thread getter/setters on the existing IPCThreadState. Change-Id: I4b6db1d445c56e868e6d0d7be3ba6849f4ef23ae
This commit is contained in:
parent
00807f5ab9
commit
5273603e98
@ -43,7 +43,10 @@ public:
|
||||
|
||||
void setStrictModePolicy(int32_t policy);
|
||||
int32_t getStrictModePolicy() const;
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
void setLastTransactionBinderFlags(int32_t flags);
|
||||
int32_t getLastTransactionBinderFlags() const;
|
||||
|
||||
int64_t clearCallingIdentity();
|
||||
void restoreCallingIdentity(int64_t token);
|
||||
|
||||
@ -113,6 +116,7 @@ private:
|
||||
pid_t mCallingPid;
|
||||
uid_t mCallingUid;
|
||||
int32_t mStrictModePolicy;
|
||||
int32_t mLastTransactionBinderFlags;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
}; // namespace android
|
||||
|
@ -377,6 +377,16 @@ int32_t IPCThreadState::getStrictModePolicy() const
|
||||
return mStrictModePolicy;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void IPCThreadState::setLastTransactionBinderFlags(int32_t flags)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mLastTransactionBinderFlags = flags;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
int32_t IPCThreadState::getLastTransactionBinderFlags() const
|
||||
{
|
||||
return mLastTransactionBinderFlags;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
void IPCThreadState::restoreCallingIdentity(int64_t token)
|
||||
{
|
||||
mCallingUid = (int)(token>>32);
|
||||
@ -598,8 +608,10 @@ status_t IPCThreadState::clearDeathNotification(int32_t handle, BpBinder* proxy)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
IPCThreadState::IPCThreadState()
|
||||
: mProcess(ProcessState::self()), mMyThreadId(androidGetTid()),
|
||||
mStrictModePolicy(0)
|
||||
: mProcess(ProcessState::self()),
|
||||
mMyThreadId(androidGetTid()),
|
||||
mStrictModePolicy(0),
|
||||
mLastTransactionBinderFlags(0)
|
||||
{
|
||||
pthread_setspecific(gTLS, this);
|
||||
clearCaller();
|
||||
@ -983,11 +995,11 @@ status_t IPCThreadState::executeCommand(int32_t cmd)
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (tr.target.ptr) {
|
||||
sp<BBinder> b((BBinder*)tr.cookie);
|
||||
const status_t error = b->transact(tr.code, buffer, &reply, 0);
|
||||
const status_t error = b->transact(tr.code, buffer, &reply, tr.flags);
|
||||
if (error < NO_ERROR) reply.setError(error);
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
const status_t error = the_context_object->transact(tr.code, buffer, &reply, 0);
|
||||
const status_t error = the_context_object->transact(tr.code, buffer, &reply, tr.flags);
|
||||
if (error < NO_ERROR) reply.setError(error);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -464,7 +464,16 @@ bool Parcel::enforceInterface(const String16& interface,
|
||||
if (threadState == NULL) {
|
||||
threadState = IPCThreadState::self();
|
||||
}
|
||||
threadState->setStrictModePolicy(strictPolicy);
|
||||
if ((threadState->getLastTransactionBinderFlags() &
|
||||
IBinder::FLAG_ONEWAY) != 0) {
|
||||
// For one-way calls, the callee is running entirely
|
||||
// disconnected from the caller, so disable StrictMode entirely.
|
||||
// Not only does disk/network usage not impact the caller, but
|
||||
// there's no way to commuicate back any violations anyway.
|
||||
threadState->setStrictModePolicy(0);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
threadState->setStrictModePolicy(strictPolicy);
|
||||
}
|
||||
const String16 str(readString16());
|
||||
if (str == interface) {
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user