we were mistakenly optimizing out SF's main transactions in some cases
due to a typo, SF's main transaction was conditional to having a display transaction. more correct fix for 6970310 Bug: 6970310 Change-Id: Iafd8c4e02afa5db829cc1c65950cfcc74754c6af
This commit is contained in:
parent
ac1f70bb71
commit
3559b07a88
@ -891,8 +891,7 @@ void SurfaceFlinger::handleTransactionLocked(uint32_t transactionFlags)
|
||||
* (perform the transaction for each of them if needed)
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
const bool layersNeedTransaction = transactionFlags & eTraversalNeeded;
|
||||
if (layersNeedTransaction) {
|
||||
if (transactionFlags & eTraversalNeeded) {
|
||||
for (size_t i=0 ; i<count ; i++) {
|
||||
const sp<LayerBase>& layer = currentLayers[i];
|
||||
uint32_t trFlags = layer->getTransactionFlags(eTransactionNeeded);
|
||||
@ -905,7 +904,7 @@ void SurfaceFlinger::handleTransactionLocked(uint32_t transactionFlags)
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Perform our own transaction if needed
|
||||
* Perform display own transactions if needed
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
if (transactionFlags & eDisplayTransactionNeeded) {
|
||||
@ -978,31 +977,35 @@ void SurfaceFlinger::handleTransactionLocked(uint32_t transactionFlags)
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (currentLayers.size() > mDrawingState.layersSortedByZ.size()) {
|
||||
// layers have been added
|
||||
mVisibleRegionsDirty = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Perform our own transaction if needed
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
// some layers might have been removed, so
|
||||
// we need to update the regions they're exposing.
|
||||
if (mLayersRemoved) {
|
||||
mLayersRemoved = false;
|
||||
mVisibleRegionsDirty = true;
|
||||
const LayerVector& previousLayers(mDrawingState.layersSortedByZ);
|
||||
const size_t count = previousLayers.size();
|
||||
for (size_t i=0 ; i<count ; i++) {
|
||||
const sp<LayerBase>& layer(previousLayers[i]);
|
||||
if (currentLayers.indexOf(layer) < 0) {
|
||||
// this layer is not visible anymore
|
||||
// TODO: we could traverse the tree from front to back and
|
||||
// compute the actual visible region
|
||||
// TODO: we could cache the transformed region
|
||||
Layer::State front(layer->drawingState());
|
||||
Region visibleReg = front.transform.transform(
|
||||
Region(Rect(front.active.w, front.active.h)));
|
||||
invalidateLayerStack(front.layerStack, visibleReg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (currentLayers.size() > mDrawingState.layersSortedByZ.size()) {
|
||||
// layers have been added
|
||||
mVisibleRegionsDirty = true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
// some layers might have been removed, so
|
||||
// we need to update the regions they're exposing.
|
||||
if (mLayersRemoved) {
|
||||
mLayersRemoved = false;
|
||||
mVisibleRegionsDirty = true;
|
||||
const LayerVector& previousLayers(mDrawingState.layersSortedByZ);
|
||||
const size_t count = previousLayers.size();
|
||||
for (size_t i=0 ; i<count ; i++) {
|
||||
const sp<LayerBase>& layer(previousLayers[i]);
|
||||
if (currentLayers.indexOf(layer) < 0) {
|
||||
// this layer is not visible anymore
|
||||
// TODO: we could traverse the tree from front to back and
|
||||
// compute the actual visible region
|
||||
// TODO: we could cache the transformed region
|
||||
Layer::State front(layer->drawingState());
|
||||
Region visibleReg = front.transform.transform(
|
||||
Region(Rect(front.active.w, front.active.h)));
|
||||
invalidateLayerStack(front.layerStack, visibleReg);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@ -1406,7 +1409,7 @@ status_t SurfaceFlinger::removeLayer(const sp<LayerBase>& layer)
|
||||
Mutex::Autolock _l(mStateLock);
|
||||
status_t err = purgatorizeLayer_l(layer);
|
||||
if (err == NO_ERROR)
|
||||
setTransactionFlags(eDisplayTransactionNeeded);
|
||||
setTransactionFlags(eTransactionNeeded);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue
Block a user